February 01, 2017Essay / Book

“The case in which judgement of attribution as to the technical scope was divided because the significance and interpretation of the term ‘cushioning material’ differed within the text of the patent claim” appeared in the “Intellectual Property Rights Precedents News” of the February issue of the monthly journal “The Invention.”

The writing is co-authored by Tetsuro Ikuta and Tatsumi Sano.

Publisher: Japan Institute for Promoting Invention and Innovation